ISLAMABAD:
The Supreme Court (SC) permitted Punjab Chief Minister Hamza Shahbaz and his cabinet to hold office until the re-election of the provincial chief minister, scheduled for July 22.
The SC issued a detailed order over the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)’s plea challenging the Lahore High Court’s (LHC) ruling ordering a re-count of votes polled for the election of Punjab CM held on April 16,
The apex court maintained in its order, penned by Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan, that, “Mr. (Hamza) Sharif has undertaken before the court that he and his Cabinet shall exercise the powers and function their offices strictly in fiduciary capacity as envisaged by the Constitution and the law to support the process of bye-election in the province to be conducted in a free, fair and transparent manner by the Election Commission of Pakistan [ECP].”
The court furthered that the commitment to act as trustees of the office, is contingent on fulfilling the duty of care towards citizens of Punjab, “so that they are not deprived of due representation and governance.”
“However, such entrustment shall continue only till 22.07.2022 when a second poll takes place in terms of Article 130(4) of the Constitution,” the written order further maintained.
Moreover, the SC directed the LHC to issue a detailed judgment for the order pertaining to the recounting of votes for the election of Punjab chief minister within a week.
The apex court observed that the LHC’s order “shall be implemented by the ECP forthwith by issuing the notification of the names of the candidates against reserved seats in accordance with the directions issued by the Lahore High Court.”
The apex court added that in the event of disagreement from any such notification, the individual shall have the right to agitate such grievance before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
The court maintained that election be held and all legal and procedural formalities be held, within one week from today; as suggested by speaker of the Punjab Assembly Pervaiz Elahi, consented to by Hamza Sharif and Babar Awan the leader of the opposition in the assembly.
The order reiterated that the bye-election against the seats which had become vacant on account of defection of members of PTI shall be held in a free, fair and transparent manner.
“The process shall be completed as per the schedule already announced by the ECP. The final result(s) and notification(s) shall also be issued accordingly,” read the order.
The apex court demanded the ECP and all relevant state functionaries including members of the parliament, provincial assemblies, ministers and advisors to ensure that all parties follow the election laws as well as the code of conduct issued by the ECP.
The SC observed that the law must be followed in its “letter and spirit” and those involved must “refrain from any interference, inducement or influence in the affairs of the executive, the local administration and the ECP or indulge in corrupt and illegal practices.”
The apex court also advised parties not to resort to harassment, intimidation or use of law enforcement agencies against opponents and candidates or their supporters, except to restore law and order.
To uphold the spirit of fair and transparent elections, the court order stated no transfers or postings of officials of the local administration, police, Provincial Election Commission shall be undertaken, except in accordance with specific provisions of the Election Act, 2017 and the Code of Conduct to meet emergency situations.
“No fresh development schemes and/or financial allocations shall be made in the constituencies where the bye-election is to be held till finalization of the bye-election,” read the statement, adding that in the event of violation of the provisions, the ECP will take appropriate action in accordance with law.
The written order added that the “speaker and the chief minister had categorically assured that all matters pertaining to the business of the assembly would be handled and dealt with peacefully, impartially and transparently.”
The order required parties to maintain a peaceful and “congenial atmosphere” not only during the poll but also in the subsequent assembly meetings.
“We expect that such undertakings and assurances shall be honoured and implemented. It is unreservedly and categorically agreed and undertaken by all parties before us that it is the constitutional, legal and moral responsibility of all political parties.”
The judges “record our appreciation regarding the positive and constructive attitude adopted and the role played not only by the top leadership of three political parties involved in the dispute but also by the respective learned counsel.”