Settler colonization is an impact of Indian hegemony, not a cause. The fundamental reason is the stony silence by the sane international community followed by rational Indians, who theoretically understand the stages of settler colonization because they have read the Homica Baba decolonization doctrine; India has consolidated the occupation in Kashmir for seven decades and extended it to the annexation phase at the proper time. The powers who matter in geopolitics and geostrategic did not take sides with humanity bleeding in Kashmir, colonized by India, even though Universal Human Rights were given mega hype as an achievement in post-WW-11. Kashmiri’s sense of agency and dignity is in the precipitation phase; therefore narrative demands a new outlook as per the degree of suppression by India in Post 5th August 2019. Kashmiris race is on the brink of extinction; therefore, Settler-colonization is a severe concern. One must not confuse it with the occupation when the internal arrangement was at least preventing the outside settlement, and the state subject was identity. The Free Hand to New Delhi In post-5 August 2019, no formidable tangible global outcome to halt the unilateral move had given the Indian agencies the extra teeth, accelerating colonization multi-folds while Modi took the political dividend from It. India kept the considerable Kashmiri masses uninterruptedly in a pressure cooker to deepen the Indian unilateral decision after abrogating special provisions under 370 and 35/A. To abrogate 35/ A is a more lethal vis-à-vis double-barrel assault because it changed the state subject rules and pawed the way for settler colonization. It pretends to mention that Neutrality helped the oppressor and marred the victim. It is the cause behind the saga of the trajectory from Occupation, Annexation, and Colonization. Wlie Wisel rightly quoted that silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. The rationale for India was that she tried her utmost while using lethal power to crush the resistance but could not, hence the formidable solution to change the majority into a minority. India upgraded an occupation, followed by annexation, and Now the settler-colonization. An Indian scholar Homey Baba defines the critical concept of applying systematic policies when a colonizer wants to keep the geography intact by hook or crock. Ambivalence is the first step among them, generally called the double standard. The ambivalence is that the victim is given the wrong name as the aggressor, and the aggressed becomes the victim because enormous resources are pumped to consolidate this discourse. The Colonizer India is putting all efforts to prove that Kashmiris have no issue with India, but the Kashmiris are supported by outside, and this discourse works. Hence, the victim has little or no support because Homey Baba’s discourse analysis once applied to the colonized Kashmir, is similar to what Brashers used in India, which India uses in Kashmir. The second phase is the diaspora because now a huge number of the Kashmiri people live there, and other diasporas of India have the same issue, so this is the exciting point where victims can unite. They feel the same connection. They share nostalgia, and they have an identity crisis. The third is Colonizer behaves as a hegemon. Marconi Gramine coins this term; the colonized authorities inculcate in the mind of the masses of the Kashmiris that Indian policy is in the interest of the people, so the education of the people is changed as per the Colonizer’s interest as India had introduced the NCERT system. In the identity crisis, the occupier in uniform asks Kashmiris to prove their identity. This physiological trauma has severe consequences. However, despite this mayhem, the strongest people are the ones who are still kind after the world tore them apart. Farinc Fomen, Aime Casire, Frantz Fanon, and Edward Said were core scholars who deconstructed the decolonization theory in Europe and the Middle East. Still, the points raised by Homica Baba of India are relevant to Kashmir when India as Colonizer is in the final phase in Kashmir as psychological effects on colonized are more lithal than colonizers because the 5th August unilateral move with no tangible outcome to warn India had pawed the way to publish the strategic map of Akhand Bharat on Walls of the Indian parliament is the strategic line for every ruler to full fill in coming years. However, Negative peace can be kept by force. Still, permanent consensus can be reached by accommodating diverse views and understanding while upholding the UN resolutions. However, the time factor is vital to alarm when settler-colonization is complete; Jammu will also be separated from Kashmir. In the entire three areas, Kashmiri will be in the minority.
The doctrine of Akhand Bharat is not now the only threat to states digested by India from w947-till date, but entire SAARC nations have to face the wrath. It is why if SAARC nations do not raise their fat as the mathematical formulas If we value (A) what India did to states which were independent up to 1974, What India did to states In the West in value of (B) what used to be the policy of India in arming the Armed groups against Sri-Lanka. What are Indian relations with Nepal, Bhutan, and Bangladesh in Post developmental agreements with China? What is the meaning of the painting, the Akhan Bharta Map, in the Indian Parliament? Is the value of (C) How much India is spending on the military budget annually? Any and everybody can predict the value of the ( D) based on concrete empirical evidence. The SAARC states will be following in, so this needs to be taught in the minds of higher Ups of neighboring nations based on evidence that may help Kashmiris.